WHO ARE BAD AGENTS?

WHO ARE BAD AGENTS? FINANCIAL PLANNERS AND  INSURANCE AGENTS ARE THE MAIN TWO.

Bad Insurance Agent 

  • They are very restricted in the products they offer.
  • They sell the same products again and again even though there are better products to fulfill their clients needs.
  • They don’t disclose the restrictions the products have.

Bad Financial Advisor

  • If they try to sell you a Section 79 plan as a wealth building tool.
  • Most financial advisors are restricted by the types of investment products they can offer to clients. Many of them aren’t able to offer Retirement Life products. The majority of them aren’t able to offer guaranteed return income for Life Insurance products.
  • Lack of disclosure is a very big problem nowadays. Anyone who doesn’t disclose the clients limitations is a bad advisor.

BUYER BEWARE AND BE AWARE

THE DANGERS OF BEING LISTED

THE DANGERS OF BEING LISTEDA warning for Section 79 Plans

Taxpayers who previously adopted 419, 412i, captive insurance or Section 79 plans are in big trouble.

In recent years, the IRS has identified many of these arrangements as abusive devices to funnel tax deductible dollars to shareholders and classified these arrangements as “listed transactions.”

These plans were sold by insurance agents, financial planners, accountants and attorneys seeking large life insurance commissions. In general, taxpayers who engage in a “listed transaction” must report such transaction to the IRS on Form 8886 every year that they “participate” in the transaction, and you do not necessarily have to make a contribution or claim a tax deduction to participate.  Section 6707A of the Code imposes severe penalties ($200,000 for a business and $100,000 for an individual) for failure to file Form 8886 with respect to a listed transaction.

But you are also in trouble if you file incorrectly.

SECTION 79 EXCEPTIONS

1. ACCIDENTAL DEATH

LARGE IRS FINES CONTINUE FOR 419, 412I, CAPTIVE INSURANCE AND SECTION79 PLANS

Taxpayers must report certain transactions to the IRS under Section 6707A of the Tax Code, which was enacted in 2004 to help detect, deter, and shut down abusive tax shelter activities. For example, reportable transactions may include being in a 419,412i, or other insurance plans sold by insurance agents for tax deduction purposes. Other abusive transactions could include captive insurance and section 79 plans, which are usually sold by insurance agents for tax deductions. Taxpayers must disclose their participation in these and other transactions by filing a Reportable Transactions Disclosure Statement (Form 8886) with their income tax returns. People that sell these plans are called material advisors and must also file 8918 forms properly. Failure to report the transactions could result in monetary penalties in excess of $10,000. Accountants who sign tax returns, which have these deductions, can also be called material advisors and should also file forms 8918 properly.

The IRS has fined hundreds of taxpayers who did file under 6707A. They said that they did not fill out the forms properly, or did not file correctly. The plan administrator or a 412i advised over 200 of his clients how to file. They were then all fined by the IRS for filling out the forms wrong. The fines averaged about $500,000 per taxpayer.

 A report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) found that the procedures for documenting and assessing the Section 6707A penalty were not sufficient or formalized, and cases often are not fully developed.

TIGTA evaluated the IRS’s effectiveness in identifying, developing, and applying the Section 6707A penalty. Based on its review of 114 assessed Section 6707A penalties, TIGTA determined that many of these files were incomplete or did not contain sufficient audit evidence. TIGTA also found a need for better coordination between the IRS’s Office of Tax Shelter Analysis and other functions.

“As penalties are meant to encourage voluntary taxpayer compliance, it is important that IRS procedures for documenting and assessing them be well developed and fully documented,” said TIGTA Inspector General J. Russell George in a statement. “Any failure to do so raises the risk that taxpayers will not receive consistent and fair treatment under the law, and could further reduce their willingness to comply voluntarily.”

The Section 6707A penalty is a stand-alone penalty and does not require an associated income tax examination; therefore, it applies regardless of whether the reportable transaction results in an understatement of tax. TIGTA determined that, in most cases, the Section 6707A penalty was substantially higher than additional tax assessments taxpayers received from the audit of underlying tax returns. I have had phone calls from taxpayers that contributed less than $100.000 to a listed transaction and were fined over $500,000. I have had phone calls from taxpayers that went into 419, or 412i plans but made no contributions and were fined a large amount of money for being in a listed transaction and not properly filing forms under IRC section 6707A. The IRS claims that the fines are non-appealable.

On July 7, 2009, at the request of Congress, the IRS agreed to suspend collection enforcement actions. However, this did not preclude the issuance of notices of assessment that are required by law and adjustment notices that inform the taxpayer of any account activity. In addition, taxpayers continued to receive balance due and final notices of intent to levy and pay Section 6707A penalties.

TIGTA recommended that the IRS fully develop, document, and properly process Section 6707A penalties. The IRS agreed with TIGTA’s recommendation and plans to take appropriate corrective actions. I think as a result of this many taxpayers who have not yet been fined will shortly receive the fines. Unless a taxpayer files properly there is no statute of limitations. The IRS has, and will continue to go back many years and fine people that are in listed, reportable or similar to transactions.

If you are, or were in a 412i, 419, captive insurance or section 79 plan you should immediately file under 6707A protectively. If you have already filed you should find someone who knows what he is doing to review the forms. I only know of two people who know how to properly file. The IRS instructions are vague. If a taxpayer files wrong, or fills out the forms wrong he still gets the fine. I have had hundreds of phone calls from people in that situation.

TAX IMPLICATIONS FOR NON-DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYER-PAID LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE THAT EXCEEDS $50,000

The Internal Revenue Service discusses circumstances under which some portion of Group Term Life Insurance premiums may be taxable.

Section 79 permits up to $50,000 of group term life insurance coverage paid for by an employer (carried directly or indirectly) to be considered tax-free if the plan is non-discriminatory (i.e. does not favor key employees). Every year, employers must calculate the tax consequences of offering employees more than $50,000 in employer-paid term life coverage. Employers must also test the plan to make sure it does not favor key employees. If it does, those key
employees have to pay additional taxes. Employers also need to review their voluntary life coverage to determine whether any income needs to be imputed on the voluntary plan because of the voluntary rate table. Finally, organizations allowing employees to pay for life insurance with pretax dollars will likely need to
impute income for that coverage as well. There are no tax consequences if the total amount of such policies does not exceed $50,000. The imputed cost of coverage in excess of $50,000 must be
included in income, using the IRS Premium Table, and are subject to social security and Medicare taxes.